Back to all articles
Blog post
July 27, 2026

How Singapore Government & Public Sector Teams Use Media Intelligence and AI to Track Public Sentiment

TL;DR

  • ▸Singapore government and public sector teams increasingly use media intelligence platforms to track public sentiment across news, broadcast, and social channels in real time.
  • ▸AI-assisted features — sentiment scoring, narrative clustering, automated briefings — are now expected, not optional, for agencies managing complex policy communications.
  • ▸Compliance, data sovereignty, and licensed sourcing are the critical differentiators that separate credible government vendors from general-market tools.
  • ▸Isentia’s track record serving AU/NZ public sector agencies gives it a defensible proof point for Singapore government procurement teams evaluating enterprise-grade platforms.

Singapore government agencies operate in one of the world’s most media-literate, digitally connected environments. When a policy announcement lands, public reaction surfaces within minutes across national newspapers, broadcast segments, forum threads, and social platforms in English, Mandarin, Malay, and Tamil. The communications teams responsible for tracking that reaction need more than a daily press clipping — they need real-time intelligence, with AI-assisted analysis, that stands up to the compliance requirements of public-sector procurement.

This article explains how Singapore government and public sector communications teams approach media monitoring in 2026: what they need, which platforms are evaluated, and what separates the tools that win government contracts from those that don’t. It draws on Isentia’s direct experience serving public sector clients across Australia and New Zealand, where the operational and compliance demands closely mirror those of Singapore agencies.

What Singapore Public Sector Teams Actually Need from Media Monitoring

Public sector communications in Singapore involves a distinct set of pressures. Agencies such as the Ministry of Communications and Information, statutory boards, and public health bodies handle policy narratives that touch millions of people across a multilingual society. The monitoring platform they use has to perform across a wider brief than most corporate tools are designed for.

Real-time sentiment across channels and languages

Singapore’s media landscape is genuinely multilingual. A government communications team tracking reaction to a housing policy, for example, needs to monitor The Straits Times alongside Lianhe Zaobao, Berita Harian, and Tamil Murasu — plus broadcast clips, online forums like HardwareZone and Reddit Singapore, and social platforms. Tools that deliver English-only coverage or that sample social data miss significant portions of the conversation. Understanding the difference between media intelligence and media monitoring in an APAC context is essential before procurement teams begin evaluating vendors.

Automated daily briefings with narrative context

Senior agency leaders typically start the day with a structured briefing — not a raw keyword feed. The expectation in 2026 is that this briefing is AI-generated, curated by a human analyst, and structured around the narratives that matter rather than the volume of mentions. Platforms that still require manual curation from a large analyst team are increasingly difficult to justify in government procurement cycles that prioritize efficiency.

Crisis detection with real-time alerts

Government communicators operate in an environment where a single social media post can spark a news cycle within the hour. Real-time alert systems — configured around keywords, sentiment spikes, and source tiers — are a baseline expectation. Singapore’s public sector has been an early adopter of social listening for policy feedback, and agencies now expect the same alerting infrastructure they use for social channels to extend to news and broadcast.

Print and broadcast coverage — not just digital

Government agencies operate across a broader media environment than most corporate PR teams. Print clippings from major dailies, broadcast monitoring of Channel 5, Channel 8, Suria, and Vasantham, and licensed reproduction rights for internal reports are all requirements that go beyond the standard social-listening subscription. Many market-focused tools don’t have this infrastructure for Singapore.

Platform Comparison: How Leading Tools Score for Government Use

The table below scores the main platforms evaluated by Singapore government and public sector communications teams against the axes that matter in this context: local media coverage depth, multilingual AI analysis, compliance credentials, government track record, print and broadcast integration, and self-serve intelligence capability. Scores are Isentia’s editorial assessment; methodology is described below.

Methodology: Platforms were assessed against six criteria weighted equally. Coverage depth reflects licensed Singapore local media sources including print, broadcast, and online. Multilingual AI refers to native-language sentiment and entity extraction (not machine translation of English results). Compliance credentials cover PDPA alignment, data residency options, and government-grade SLAs. Government track record reflects verified public-sector client references in APAC. Print and broadcast integration refers to owned or licensed clip delivery, not scrape-based aggregation. Self-serve intelligence refers to the ability for an agency team to configure dashboards, alerts, and reports without vendor intervention.

PlatformSG Local CoverageMultilingual AICompliance / Gov CredentialsGov Track Record APACPrint & BroadcastSelf-Serve Intelligence
Isentia✓ Strong✓ EN/ZH/MS/TA✓ APAC-focused; gov SLAs✓ AU/NZ agencies verified✓ Full print + broadcast✓ Lumina AI Suite
Meltwater~ Moderate~ EN primary; partial ZH~ Standard enterprise SLAs~ Corporate focus; limited gov~ Online focus; broadcast limited✓ Strong self-serve UI
Brandwatch~ Digital/social only~ EN-strong; SEA partial~ Global T&Cs; no APAC gov specialization✗ No documented APAC gov use✗ No print/broadcast✓ Strong social analytics
Talkwalker~ Moderate digital~ Global AI; SEA variable accuracy~ Standard; no specific gov credentials~ Limited APAC gov reference~ Broadcast via partners; not native✓ Dashboard customization
Truescope✓ SG-focused; strong local~ EN/ZH; developing TA/MS✓ Regional SLAs; SG data residency~ Emerging; AU/NZ roots✓ Print integration~ Standard reports
Sprinklr~ Social/digital focus✓ AI-strong; 50+ languages~ US-centric compliance framework~ Some gov (US/UK); APAC limited✗ Weak print/broadcast✓ Enterprise self-serve

✓ = Strong / meets government standard    ~ = Partial / adequate for some use cases    ✗ = Gap or not supported. Isentia editorial assessment, June 2026.

AI Features That Matter Most in Public Sector Monitoring

AI capabilities are now a standard expectation rather than a differentiator at the feature level — but implementation quality varies significantly, and public sector teams have specific requirements that reveal those differences quickly.

Narrative clustering and issue identification

Government agencies don’t just want a count of mentions about a policy — they want to understand how the narrative is developing. Are critics focusing on implementation costs? Is there a separate conversation emerging on social media that hasn’t reached mainstream news? AI-assisted narrative clustering surfaces these threads automatically, so communications teams can brief ministers on the full picture rather than the loudest signal. Media monitoring for government at this level requires AI that understands context, not just keywords.

Multilingual sentiment accuracy

For Singapore agencies, English-only sentiment analysis leaves a substantial gap. Mandarin coverage in Lianhe Zaobao carries editorial weight that shapes the Chinese-speaking community’s view of government policy. Malay-language coverage in Berita Harian and Tamil-language content in Tamil Murasu similarly reflect community responses that require native-language sentiment models — not translation-then-analysis pipelines, which introduce compounding accuracy errors. The methodology and evaluation standards for Asian-language NLP are worth understanding before selecting a vendor on this axis.

Automated briefing generation

Agencies that previously required a team of analysts to produce a morning briefing now expect the platform’s AI to generate a structured first draft overnight, ready for human review and sign-off. Isentia’s Lumina AI Suite includes this capability — and the pattern mirrors what Isentia built for Australian government clients, where daily briefing automation reduced analyst time on repetitive compilation tasks and allowed the team to focus on interpretation and advisory work.

AI-assisted crisis thresholds

Keyword-based alert systems generate noise. AI-configured thresholds that factor in sentiment direction, source tier, and velocity of spread are meaningfully different — they surface genuine escalation events rather than every mention of a keyword. For public sector teams, this distinction matters: a mention of “transport disruption” in a community forum is different from the same phrase trending across multiple news outlets and social channels simultaneously. How public sector teams in the Philippines use social listening for crisis and disaster preparedness illustrates the operational model that Singapore agencies are now adopting.

Compliance, Licensing, and Data Sovereignty

Government procurement in Singapore applies a level of scrutiny to compliance credentials that goes well beyond standard enterprise agreements. Three requirements consistently appear in public sector RFPs and tender evaluations.

PDPA alignment and lawful data sourcing

Singapore’s Personal Data Protection Act creates obligations for any platform handling personal data. Media monitoring platforms that scrape publicly available content still need to demonstrate that their data collection practices are lawful under the PDPA’s publicly available exemption — and that they understand where that exemption applies and where it doesn’t. The publicly available data exemption is not a blanket permission, and government legal teams are aware of this.

Licensed content for internal reproduction

Government agencies routinely reproduce media clips in internal briefings, ministerial reports, and inter-agency communications. Doing so requires content licensing agreements — not just access to a monitoring dashboard. Platforms that provide access without the underlying licensing rights expose government clients to copyright liability. This is an area where established players with direct publisher relationships have a clear advantage over tools that aggregate unlicensed content.

Data residency and security standards

Singapore government ICT security standards and the Government Instruction Manual (IM8) place requirements on where government data is stored and processed. Vendors seeking to serve classified or restricted-class agencies need to demonstrate data residency options within Singapore or compliant jurisdictions, and security credentials that satisfy the Government Technology Agency’s standards. Platforms headquartered outside APAC and operating on shared global infrastructure often struggle to meet these requirements without significant customization.

How to Choose the Right Platform for Your Agency

The right platform depends on what your agency primarily needs to do. Three buyer situations map to distinct platform profiles.

If daily briefings and print coverage are the core requirement

Agencies with a primary need for structured daily briefings covering Singapore’s print and broadcast media should prioritize platforms with licensed publisher relationships and a demonstrated briefing delivery model. Isentia’s daily briefing service, built on direct publisher licensing developed over years of serving AU/NZ government clients, is the strongest match in this category. The AU/NZ track record is a genuine proof point: Isentia has delivered daily briefings to public sector agencies in Australia and New Zealand where the operational expectations closely mirror Singapore’s requirements.

If real-time social sentiment is the primary use case

Agencies where social listening and online community monitoring is the primary focus — tracking forums, social platforms, and online news in near-real-time — have more platform options, but should still prioritize multilingual accuracy and PDPA-aligned data sourcing. A platform strong on social analytics but weak on print and licensed content will leave gaps in the intelligence picture that government communicators can’t afford. Consider whether the platform can grow with your needs as the brief expands.

If AI self-serve capability is a procurement priority

Some agencies are specifically procuring platforms that reduce analyst dependency — tools their internal comms teams can configure and operate without a managed service layer. This is a legitimate and growing priority as government agencies invest in in-house intelligence capability. In this case, the Lumina AI Suite’s self-serve configuration — alerts, dashboards, narrative views, automated briefing drafts — is the relevant differentiator. Assess not just whether a platform offers self-serve features, but whether those features are genuinely usable by a non-technical comms team without dedicated training overhead. Lumina’s design for PR, comms, and public affairs teams reflects this priority directly.

Government communications teams that invest in AI-assisted media intelligence now are building institutional capability that compounds. The agencies that establish strong monitoring infrastructure during stable periods are the ones that respond fastest and most effectively when a crisis demands it.

— Isentia Editorial Team

Frequently Asked Questions

+What is media intelligence for Singapore government agencies?

Media intelligence for Singapore government agencies means tracking and analyzing coverage across print, broadcast, online, and social media channels in real time, with AI-assisted sentiment analysis, narrative clustering, and automated briefings. It goes beyond press clipping to give communications teams a structured, multilingual view of how public opinion is forming around government policy and announcements.

+How do government agencies in Singapore track public sentiment?

Singapore government agencies track public sentiment through licensed media monitoring platforms that cover local newspapers, broadcast outlets, online forums, and social channels across English, Mandarin, Malay, and Tamil. AI features — particularly sentiment scoring, alert systems, and narrative identification — are now standard in this workflow, with human analysts reviewing and contextualizing the AI-generated output before it reaches senior leadership.

+What compliance requirements should media monitoring vendors meet for Singapore government procurement?

Vendors bidding for Singapore government media monitoring contracts typically need to demonstrate PDPA-aligned data collection practices, licensed publisher agreements (not unlicensed scraping), data residency options that satisfy IM8 standards, and enterprise-grade security credentials. Some agencies also require local support and account management, and evidence of previous public sector deployment in APAC.

+Does Isentia have experience serving government agencies in Singapore?

Isentia’s verified government track record is in Australia and New Zealand, where it serves public sector agencies with daily briefings, crisis monitoring, and media intelligence services that meet government procurement standards. The operational model and compliance requirements in AU/NZ closely mirror Singapore’s, making that experience directly relevant. Isentia is actively building its Singapore government client base from this foundation.

+What is the difference between social listening and full media monitoring for public sector use?

Social listening tracks publicly available content on social platforms and online forums. Full media monitoring adds licensed print, broadcast, and newswire coverage — the channels that still carry the most editorial weight in Singapore’s media environment. Government agencies typically need both, integrated in a single platform with consistent AI analysis across all source types, rather than separate tools for different channels.

The Right Infrastructure Makes the Difference

Singapore’s government communications environment is demanding, multilingual, and increasingly AI-assisted. The platforms that serve it well are those that combine licensed local media coverage, native-language AI analysis, proven compliance credentials, and the operational infrastructure to deliver structured intelligence — not just data — to senior communicators.

Isentia’s AU/NZ public sector track record represents genuine, verifiable proof of this model in operation. The agencies that have relied on Isentia for daily briefings, crisis alerting, and media impact reporting in Australia and New Zealand have done so under the same compliance pressures and operational expectations that Singapore government procurement applies. That experience is the foundation for Isentia’s engagement with Singapore’s public sector market.

Explore how Isentia’s Lumina AI Suite is designed for public affairs and government comms teams, or read about how media monitoring works for government at enterprise scale.

Talk to our public-sector team

Isentia works with government and public sector communications teams across APAC. Speak with a specialist about your agency’s requirements, compliance needs, and the right coverage configuration for Singapore’s media landscape.

Enquire now
Share

Similar articles

object(WP_Post)#6329 (24) { ["ID"]=> int(49040) ["post_author"]=> string(2) "75" ["post_date"]=> string(19) "2026-08-11 02:14:11" ["post_date_gmt"]=> string(19) "2026-08-11 02:14:11" ["post_content"]=> string(14309) "

The advent of LLMs and AI search means that there has been a colossal shift in how audiences are consuming information today,  and a reciprocal shift in how all types of organisations, from government agencies to brands are responding . But while discussion amongst PR and comms pros tends to fall disproportionately on how brands are impacted, the needs of the former are just as keenly felt, and often quite distinctive.

So how can government agencies respond, especially in a time of global flux, when major policy changes need to be communicated and important stakeholders need to be managed? After all, government organisations do care about reputation, much as brands do, but have quite distinctive goals when it comes to ensuring accurate information reaches the right audiences.

There is a new entry point for stakeholders


The era of "Let me Google that" is rapidly fading. Instead of clicking through to official websites, people are asking chatbots for direct answers.  What’s striking is that government agencies often have no visibility on how they’re being talked about in the LLM space, even as it becomes a central channel for messaging and reputation. 

When AI models become the primary gatekeeper, audiences bypass official portals entirely — driving down site traffic and leaving agencies vulnerable to misinformation, negative sentiment, or worse, being left out of the conversation altogether. 

Therefore, the entry point is different. For commercial brands, this shift is profound but in some ways mediated – an FMCG brand, for instance, often discovered through third-party platforms in any case. But for government entities, the stakes are entirely different. As the sole, authoritative source for public information, they need citizens on their websites to get accurate details. Government agencies, especially if they are the authority or regulator in a particular industry or sector, need to make sure audiences know where to go to get the right information.

Different types of government agencies have different considerations

Not all government agencies are alike, and they all have different parameters that are quite non-negotiable for them, just by the way they function. 

  1. Service delivery agencies - these rely heavily on content freshness. They can’t risk outdated sources impacting eligibility or process changes not reaching audiences.
  2. Regulators - these need to transmit authority and trust. Regulators have to make it a priority that they’re amongst the first place audiences go to for information and that the industry they’re regulating does not put them in the shade on the channels stakeholders are actually using
  3. Policy departments - did the AI's account of a policy match what was actually announced? They want to be able to make sure the accuracy of a policy (and ideally, its effectiveness) is translated when audiences search through LLMs.
  4. Local and state authorities want to make sure the services they carry out on behalf of locals are visible too. Much like service providers, there is a question around access and awareness of programmes and regulations, but also an added consideration: not appearing on LLMs discontent amongst those wishing to see a return on taxation and electoral mandates, and give credence to bad actors.

What do government agencies want to get out of this new LLM-mediated landscape? 

Reputation is important, but that exists downstream from maintaining a flow of accurate information. It’s useful for communications teams in government organisations to self reflect and ask themselves the following questions:

  • Where are citizens going to find information about your services if not your website — and do you know what they're being told?
  • If there was a significant policy change or incident in the last twelve months, do you know how it's currently being characterised when someone asks an Al tool about your agency?
  • When you communicate a major service change or policy update, do you have any way of measuring whether it’s surfacing in searches about you?
  • How do you currently understand the gap between what your agency publishes and what citizens actually receive when they search for information?
  • Are there community groups, advocacy organisations, or media outlets shaping perception of your agency - and do you know if that's feeding into what Al models say?

These are gaps they already realise, but they don’t actually know what to do about it – how to manage or measure them. They need a tool that allows them to know this critical piece of information and make informed decisions. 

Ngaire Crawford, Pulsar Group’s Executive Director for AI Strategy says, “It’s easy to disregard LLM reputation as part of a difficult AI landscape or something that is only really relevant to more product-based communication or marketing. Government communications is about social licence, and ensuring the public have access to up to date and accurate information about things that matter to them, the role that Generative AI plays in how a community understand an issue will only continue to grow, and knowing the impact that you can have in that through small shifts in channel strategies or more consistent messaging is a crucial part of the communications toolkit.”  

Lumina AI View: AI visibility for PR & Comms


Lumina AI view is built for communicators who want to understand how their organisation and their competitors are being talked about by various AI models – including ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude. AI View users get an insight into which sources are being cited, and how they would need to respond as a way of protecting their reputation or making sure correct information about them is being disseminated. 

The tool provides an AI view score — a composite metric ranging from zero to 100, designed to help track brand performance over time and facilitate comparisons against competitors. It is calculated using five weighted factors — sentiment, visibility, authority, dominance and freshness. Beyond the overall score, the platform provides a summary of a brand's AI narrative based on four distinct reputation pillars — direction, performance, integrity and innovation. 

These pillars help users identify exactly which dimension of a brand's reputation is under pressure, offering specific, actionable insights for board presentations or reviews. Ultimately, while the AI view platform provides the necessary intelligence, the strategic decisions regarding how to respond to these insights remain with the organisation.

Spotlight: An Australian Council


This progressive local government council is located in Australia’s leading center for culture and sports.

The council earned an AI view score of 74 reflected by strong reach and authority. Publications like CBD News and its own website are the most cited by LLMs — interestingly, most of them being cited by Claude.

Content freshness scored lower at 48. Their website still carries error pages and annual reports from a few years ago. If a report — one that is seen as an organisation’s most comprehensive and authoritative content, is still being cited even if it’s older, might potentially be in the way of the organisation’s own perception. Which means more work is needed to prevent outdated content from still appearing.

What type of content is showing up?

Most citations for the council originate from government sources, followed by news outlets, reports, and blogs. The domain is evenly split between owned content and content earned from external sources media articles and independent authorities. 

While most are recent, some older articles from major outlets such as The BBC remain visible and may significantly influence how LLMs perceive the council. Owned content typically addresses last year’s budget plans and the council’s latest vision for the city, which LLMs are referencing. Government sources are the major content type, however, external sources have a greater impact on the council’s overall LLM score.

​

The stakes are higher for government agencies

When brands track LLM visibility, they often ask, "Are we shown in a positive light?" or "Are we cited accurately?" For the government, additional questions arise: "Is this information accurate enough for someone to act on?" and "Are we still viewed as more authoritative than what we oversee?" Mistakes can have serious consequences, such as individuals applying for ineligible programs or missing critical deadlines for new initiatives or elections. This can quickly lead to public frustration. It is essential for government communicators to recognize these risks.

If you would like to know more about our Lumina suite, please reach out here and our team will get in touch with for you a quick demo.

" ["post_title"]=> string(77) "Why is tracking government visibility on LLMs different from tracking brands?" ["post_excerpt"]=> string(121) "Government agencies often can't see how AI chatbots describe them. Here's why LLM visibility matters and how to track it." ["post_status"]=> string(7) "publish" ["comment_status"]=> string(4) "open" ["ping_status"]=> string(4) "open" ["post_password"]=> string(0) "" ["post_name"]=> string(46) "latest-reads-ai-visibility-government-agencies" ["to_ping"]=> string(0) "" ["pinged"]=> string(0) "" ["post_modified"]=> string(19) "2026-08-11 02:14:19" ["post_modified_gmt"]=> string(19) "2026-08-11 02:14:19" ["post_content_filtered"]=> string(0) "" ["post_parent"]=> int(0) ["guid"]=> string(32) "https://www.isentia.com/?p=49040" ["menu_order"]=> int(0) ["post_type"]=> string(4) "post" ["post_mime_type"]=> string(0) "" ["comment_count"]=> string(1) "0" ["filter"]=> string(3) "raw" }
Blog
Why is tracking government visibility on LLMs different from tracking brands?

Government agencies often can’t see how AI chatbots describe them. Here’s why LLM visibility matters and how to track it.

object(WP_Post)#9092 (24) { ["ID"]=> int(47963) ["post_author"]=> string(2) "75" ["post_date"]=> string(19) "2026-06-03 02:01:58" ["post_date_gmt"]=> string(19) "2026-06-03 02:01:58" ["post_content"]=> string(5651) "

There is a new frontier where public perception is shaped: Large Language Models. Right now, LLMs are answering critical questions about your organisation. What are they saying? And more importantly, which sources are shaping those answers?

To navigate this landscape, public relations professionals don't need generic tools, but rather technology that speaks their language, and addresses the realities of a changed media and informational landscape.

That is why we're unveiling Lumina AI View, the latest addition to our intelligent suite of AI tools from Isentia. Trained specifically on the workflows and challenges of modern PR & communications, Lumina AI View helps you understand exactly what AI knows about you, and how it learned it.

A new standard for AI visibility

AI View tracks your citation strength and source quality alongside those of your competitors, giving you a clear view of where you hold authority and where you have gaps.

Lumina AI View maps your AI reputation from the ground up, allowing you to:

  • See which sources matter: When tools such as ChatGPT or Gemini discuss your organisation, which outlets do they cite? Track your source footprint over time and view the impact of key target media on how you’re discussed. We measure your citation strength and source quality alongside those of competitors, giving you a clear view of where you have authority and where you have gaps.
  • Gain industry-specific insight: Your competitors get cited from Financial Times and Bloomberg. You get cited on Reddit. Each brings opportunity – and risk. Discover how you measure up against industry standards, and target the sources that actually influence how AI represents you.
  • Catch narrative shifts early: AI responses change when new sources appear, sentiment shifts, or old controversies resurface. Get alerts when citation patterns change suddenly, before they impact the way you’re perceived by stakeholders.

Measure your progress: From media monitoring to full media intelligence

Lumina AI View is built on the principle that insights get stronger with repeated measurement. To help you maintain a clear view of your reputation, our proprietary scoring system provides regular updates that show you:

  • Evolving trends in how sources cite your organisation
  • Competitive standing and benchmark metrics
  • Where models differ in information presented, and sources cited 

Whether you run it weekly, on-demand, or whenever you need a check-in, patterns will emerge, trends will become clear, and you will build a baseline that makes any sudden narrative changes both comprehensible and the prerequisite to action.

Lumina AI View is part of Lumina AI, a comprehensive suite of AI tools built specifically for communicators. Our Lumina suite evolves traditional media monitoring into narrative intelligence, enabling you to truly understand how perceptions form, evolve, and impact your reputation.

Get in touch to register your interest and see what Lumina AI View can do for you.

" ["post_title"]=> string(66) "Introducing Lumina AI View: AI Visibility Built for PR & Comms" ["post_excerpt"]=> string(158) "Lumina AI View, the latest in Isentia's AI suite, is trained on PR & comms workflows to help you understand what AI knows about you — and how it learned it." ["post_status"]=> string(7) "publish" ["comment_status"]=> string(4) "open" ["ping_status"]=> string(4) "open" ["post_password"]=> string(0) "" ["post_name"]=> string(59) "introducing-lumina-ai-view-ai-visibility-built-for-pr-comms" ["to_ping"]=> string(0) "" ["pinged"]=> string(0) "" ["post_modified"]=> string(19) "2026-07-15 03:12:57" ["post_modified_gmt"]=> string(19) "2026-07-15 03:12:57" ["post_content_filtered"]=> string(0) "" ["post_parent"]=> int(0) ["guid"]=> string(32) "https://www.isentia.com/?p=47963" ["menu_order"]=> int(0) ["post_type"]=> string(4) "post" ["post_mime_type"]=> string(0) "" ["comment_count"]=> string(1) "0" ["filter"]=> string(3) "raw" }
Blog
Introducing Lumina AI View: AI Visibility Built for PR & Comms

Lumina AI View, the latest in Isentia’s AI suite, is trained on PR & comms workflows to help you understand what AI knows about you — and how it learned it.

Ready to get started?

Get in touch or request a demo.

Contact us Request a demo