Back to all articles
Blog post
July 27, 2026

How Singapore Government & Public Sector Teams Use Media Intelligence and AI to Track Public Sentiment

TL;DR

  • ▸Singapore government and public sector teams increasingly use media intelligence platforms to track public sentiment across news, broadcast, and social channels in real time.
  • ▸AI-assisted features — sentiment scoring, narrative clustering, automated briefings — are now expected, not optional, for agencies managing complex policy communications.
  • ▸Compliance, data sovereignty, and licensed sourcing are the critical differentiators that separate credible government vendors from general-market tools.
  • ▸Isentia’s track record serving AU/NZ public sector agencies gives it a defensible proof point for Singapore government procurement teams evaluating enterprise-grade platforms.

Singapore government agencies operate in one of the world’s most media-literate, digitally connected environments. When a policy announcement lands, public reaction surfaces within minutes across national newspapers, broadcast segments, forum threads, and social platforms in English, Mandarin, Malay, and Tamil. The communications teams responsible for tracking that reaction need more than a daily press clipping — they need real-time intelligence, with AI-assisted analysis, that stands up to the compliance requirements of public-sector procurement.

This article explains how Singapore government and public sector communications teams approach media monitoring in 2026: what they need, which platforms are evaluated, and what separates the tools that win government contracts from those that don’t. It draws on Isentia’s direct experience serving public sector clients across Australia and New Zealand, where the operational and compliance demands closely mirror those of Singapore agencies.

What Singapore Public Sector Teams Actually Need from Media Monitoring

Public sector communications in Singapore involves a distinct set of pressures. Agencies such as the Ministry of Communications and Information, statutory boards, and public health bodies handle policy narratives that touch millions of people across a multilingual society. The monitoring platform they use has to perform across a wider brief than most corporate tools are designed for.

Real-time sentiment across channels and languages

Singapore’s media landscape is genuinely multilingual. A government communications team tracking reaction to a housing policy, for example, needs to monitor The Straits Times alongside Lianhe Zaobao, Berita Harian, and Tamil Murasu — plus broadcast clips, online forums like HardwareZone and Reddit Singapore, and social platforms. Tools that deliver English-only coverage or that sample social data miss significant portions of the conversation. Understanding the difference between media intelligence and media monitoring in an APAC context is essential before procurement teams begin evaluating vendors.

Automated daily briefings with narrative context

Senior agency leaders typically start the day with a structured briefing — not a raw keyword feed. The expectation in 2026 is that this briefing is AI-generated, curated by a human analyst, and structured around the narratives that matter rather than the volume of mentions. Platforms that still require manual curation from a large analyst team are increasingly difficult to justify in government procurement cycles that prioritize efficiency.

Crisis detection with real-time alerts

Government communicators operate in an environment where a single social media post can spark a news cycle within the hour. Real-time alert systems — configured around keywords, sentiment spikes, and source tiers — are a baseline expectation. Singapore’s public sector has been an early adopter of social listening for policy feedback, and agencies now expect the same alerting infrastructure they use for social channels to extend to news and broadcast.

Print and broadcast coverage — not just digital

Government agencies operate across a broader media environment than most corporate PR teams. Print clippings from major dailies, broadcast monitoring of Channel 5, Channel 8, Suria, and Vasantham, and licensed reproduction rights for internal reports are all requirements that go beyond the standard social-listening subscription. Many market-focused tools don’t have this infrastructure for Singapore.

Platform Comparison: How Leading Tools Score for Government Use

The table below scores the main platforms evaluated by Singapore government and public sector communications teams against the axes that matter in this context: local media coverage depth, multilingual AI analysis, compliance credentials, government track record, print and broadcast integration, and self-serve intelligence capability. Scores are Isentia’s editorial assessment; methodology is described below.

Methodology: Platforms were assessed against six criteria weighted equally. Coverage depth reflects licensed Singapore local media sources including print, broadcast, and online. Multilingual AI refers to native-language sentiment and entity extraction (not machine translation of English results). Compliance credentials cover PDPA alignment, data residency options, and government-grade SLAs. Government track record reflects verified public-sector client references in APAC. Print and broadcast integration refers to owned or licensed clip delivery, not scrape-based aggregation. Self-serve intelligence refers to the ability for an agency team to configure dashboards, alerts, and reports without vendor intervention.

PlatformSG Local CoverageMultilingual AICompliance / Gov CredentialsGov Track Record APACPrint & BroadcastSelf-Serve Intelligence
Isentia✓ Strong✓ EN/ZH/MS/TA✓ APAC-focused; gov SLAs✓ AU/NZ agencies verified✓ Full print + broadcast✓ Lumina AI Suite
Meltwater~ Moderate~ EN primary; partial ZH~ Standard enterprise SLAs~ Corporate focus; limited gov~ Online focus; broadcast limited✓ Strong self-serve UI
Brandwatch~ Digital/social only~ EN-strong; SEA partial~ Global T&Cs; no APAC gov specialization✗ No documented APAC gov use✗ No print/broadcast✓ Strong social analytics
Talkwalker~ Moderate digital~ Global AI; SEA variable accuracy~ Standard; no specific gov credentials~ Limited APAC gov reference~ Broadcast via partners; not native✓ Dashboard customization
Truescope✓ SG-focused; strong local~ EN/ZH; developing TA/MS✓ Regional SLAs; SG data residency~ Emerging; AU/NZ roots✓ Print integration~ Standard reports
Sprinklr~ Social/digital focus✓ AI-strong; 50+ languages~ US-centric compliance framework~ Some gov (US/UK); APAC limited✗ Weak print/broadcast✓ Enterprise self-serve

✓ = Strong / meets government standard    ~ = Partial / adequate for some use cases    ✗ = Gap or not supported. Isentia editorial assessment, June 2026.

AI Features That Matter Most in Public Sector Monitoring

AI capabilities are now a standard expectation rather than a differentiator at the feature level — but implementation quality varies significantly, and public sector teams have specific requirements that reveal those differences quickly.

Narrative clustering and issue identification

Government agencies don’t just want a count of mentions about a policy — they want to understand how the narrative is developing. Are critics focusing on implementation costs? Is there a separate conversation emerging on social media that hasn’t reached mainstream news? AI-assisted narrative clustering surfaces these threads automatically, so communications teams can brief ministers on the full picture rather than the loudest signal. Media monitoring for government at this level requires AI that understands context, not just keywords.

Multilingual sentiment accuracy

For Singapore agencies, English-only sentiment analysis leaves a substantial gap. Mandarin coverage in Lianhe Zaobao carries editorial weight that shapes the Chinese-speaking community’s view of government policy. Malay-language coverage in Berita Harian and Tamil-language content in Tamil Murasu similarly reflect community responses that require native-language sentiment models — not translation-then-analysis pipelines, which introduce compounding accuracy errors. The methodology and evaluation standards for Asian-language NLP are worth understanding before selecting a vendor on this axis.

Automated briefing generation

Agencies that previously required a team of analysts to produce a morning briefing now expect the platform’s AI to generate a structured first draft overnight, ready for human review and sign-off. Isentia’s Lumina AI Suite includes this capability — and the pattern mirrors what Isentia built for Australian government clients, where daily briefing automation reduced analyst time on repetitive compilation tasks and allowed the team to focus on interpretation and advisory work.

AI-assisted crisis thresholds

Keyword-based alert systems generate noise. AI-configured thresholds that factor in sentiment direction, source tier, and velocity of spread are meaningfully different — they surface genuine escalation events rather than every mention of a keyword. For public sector teams, this distinction matters: a mention of “transport disruption” in a community forum is different from the same phrase trending across multiple news outlets and social channels simultaneously. How public sector teams in the Philippines use social listening for crisis and disaster preparedness illustrates the operational model that Singapore agencies are now adopting.

Compliance, Licensing, and Data Sovereignty

Government procurement in Singapore applies a level of scrutiny to compliance credentials that goes well beyond standard enterprise agreements. Three requirements consistently appear in public sector RFPs and tender evaluations.

PDPA alignment and lawful data sourcing

Singapore’s Personal Data Protection Act creates obligations for any platform handling personal data. Media monitoring platforms that scrape publicly available content still need to demonstrate that their data collection practices are lawful under the PDPA’s publicly available exemption — and that they understand where that exemption applies and where it doesn’t. The publicly available data exemption is not a blanket permission, and government legal teams are aware of this.

Licensed content for internal reproduction

Government agencies routinely reproduce media clips in internal briefings, ministerial reports, and inter-agency communications. Doing so requires content licensing agreements — not just access to a monitoring dashboard. Platforms that provide access without the underlying licensing rights expose government clients to copyright liability. This is an area where established players with direct publisher relationships have a clear advantage over tools that aggregate unlicensed content.

Data residency and security standards

Singapore government ICT security standards and the Government Instruction Manual (IM8) place requirements on where government data is stored and processed. Vendors seeking to serve classified or restricted-class agencies need to demonstrate data residency options within Singapore or compliant jurisdictions, and security credentials that satisfy the Government Technology Agency’s standards. Platforms headquartered outside APAC and operating on shared global infrastructure often struggle to meet these requirements without significant customization.

How to Choose the Right Platform for Your Agency

The right platform depends on what your agency primarily needs to do. Three buyer situations map to distinct platform profiles.

If daily briefings and print coverage are the core requirement

Agencies with a primary need for structured daily briefings covering Singapore’s print and broadcast media should prioritize platforms with licensed publisher relationships and a demonstrated briefing delivery model. Isentia’s daily briefing service, built on direct publisher licensing developed over years of serving AU/NZ government clients, is the strongest match in this category. The AU/NZ track record is a genuine proof point: Isentia has delivered daily briefings to public sector agencies in Australia and New Zealand where the operational expectations closely mirror Singapore’s requirements.

If real-time social sentiment is the primary use case

Agencies where social listening and online community monitoring is the primary focus — tracking forums, social platforms, and online news in near-real-time — have more platform options, but should still prioritize multilingual accuracy and PDPA-aligned data sourcing. A platform strong on social analytics but weak on print and licensed content will leave gaps in the intelligence picture that government communicators can’t afford. Consider whether the platform can grow with your needs as the brief expands.

If AI self-serve capability is a procurement priority

Some agencies are specifically procuring platforms that reduce analyst dependency — tools their internal comms teams can configure and operate without a managed service layer. This is a legitimate and growing priority as government agencies invest in in-house intelligence capability. In this case, the Lumina AI Suite’s self-serve configuration — alerts, dashboards, narrative views, automated briefing drafts — is the relevant differentiator. Assess not just whether a platform offers self-serve features, but whether those features are genuinely usable by a non-technical comms team without dedicated training overhead. Lumina’s design for PR, comms, and public affairs teams reflects this priority directly.

Government communications teams that invest in AI-assisted media intelligence now are building institutional capability that compounds. The agencies that establish strong monitoring infrastructure during stable periods are the ones that respond fastest and most effectively when a crisis demands it.

— Isentia Editorial Team

Frequently Asked Questions

+What is media intelligence for Singapore government agencies?

Media intelligence for Singapore government agencies means tracking and analyzing coverage across print, broadcast, online, and social media channels in real time, with AI-assisted sentiment analysis, narrative clustering, and automated briefings. It goes beyond press clipping to give communications teams a structured, multilingual view of how public opinion is forming around government policy and announcements.

+How do government agencies in Singapore track public sentiment?

Singapore government agencies track public sentiment through licensed media monitoring platforms that cover local newspapers, broadcast outlets, online forums, and social channels across English, Mandarin, Malay, and Tamil. AI features — particularly sentiment scoring, alert systems, and narrative identification — are now standard in this workflow, with human analysts reviewing and contextualizing the AI-generated output before it reaches senior leadership.

+What compliance requirements should media monitoring vendors meet for Singapore government procurement?

Vendors bidding for Singapore government media monitoring contracts typically need to demonstrate PDPA-aligned data collection practices, licensed publisher agreements (not unlicensed scraping), data residency options that satisfy IM8 standards, and enterprise-grade security credentials. Some agencies also require local support and account management, and evidence of previous public sector deployment in APAC.

+Does Isentia have experience serving government agencies in Singapore?

Isentia’s verified government track record is in Australia and New Zealand, where it serves public sector agencies with daily briefings, crisis monitoring, and media intelligence services that meet government procurement standards. The operational model and compliance requirements in AU/NZ closely mirror Singapore’s, making that experience directly relevant. Isentia is actively building its Singapore government client base from this foundation.

+What is the difference between social listening and full media monitoring for public sector use?

Social listening tracks publicly available content on social platforms and online forums. Full media monitoring adds licensed print, broadcast, and newswire coverage — the channels that still carry the most editorial weight in Singapore’s media environment. Government agencies typically need both, integrated in a single platform with consistent AI analysis across all source types, rather than separate tools for different channels.

The Right Infrastructure Makes the Difference

Singapore’s government communications environment is demanding, multilingual, and increasingly AI-assisted. The platforms that serve it well are those that combine licensed local media coverage, native-language AI analysis, proven compliance credentials, and the operational infrastructure to deliver structured intelligence — not just data — to senior communicators.

Isentia’s AU/NZ public sector track record represents genuine, verifiable proof of this model in operation. The agencies that have relied on Isentia for daily briefings, crisis alerting, and media impact reporting in Australia and New Zealand have done so under the same compliance pressures and operational expectations that Singapore government procurement applies. That experience is the foundation for Isentia’s engagement with Singapore’s public sector market.

Explore how Isentia’s Lumina AI Suite is designed for public affairs and government comms teams, or read about how media monitoring works for government at enterprise scale.

Talk to our public-sector team

Isentia works with government and public sector communications teams across APAC. Speak with a specialist about your agency’s requirements, compliance needs, and the right coverage configuration for Singapore’s media landscape.

Enquire now
Share

Similar articles

object(WP_Post)#6378 (24) { ["ID"]=> int(48739) ["post_author"]=> string(2) "75" ["post_date"]=> string(19) "2026-07-23 02:33:57" ["post_date_gmt"]=> string(19) "2026-07-23 02:33:57" ["post_content"]=> string(14557) "

The Australian public’s reaction to government reforms and leaders was especially eventful. Debates about campus safety by the Royal Commission, a tax deal between Labor and the Greens unsettling the finance and property sectors, and a speech on “monoculture” by Pauline Hanson shifting opinion polls in an unexpected way; were three complex stories that saw audiences taking different sides, leading to many perspectives and angles.

We used Isentia's Lumina to track the different viewpoints, key people, and stories with the largest volume and audience. Over four weeks (22 June to 17 July), we found 62 unique perspectives and nearly 900 media items across these three stories.

Key Stories, Key Drivers

Here’s a quick overview:

▸  Campus Antisemitism at the Royal Commission — Pro-Palestinian groups, Jewish advocacy groups, and the federal government each put a different framing on the same hearings. Key drivers: Nasser Mashni, Yasmine Johnson, the Australian Union of Jewish Students, Jason Clare, TEQSA.

▸  The Labor–Greens Tax Deal — Government and Greens call it fairness for first-home buyers; finance and business groups call it policy on the run. Key drivers: Jim Chalmers, Nick McKim, the Self-Managed Super Fund Association, the Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry.

▸  Pauline Hanson's Monoculture Speech — A push for cultural unity that critics called divisive, followed by a real slide in the polls. Key drivers: Pauline Hanson, Paul Hogan, Murray Watt, Newspoll, Redbridge.

The Royal Commission on campus anti-semitism

The Royal Commission on Antisemitism and Social Cohesion’s hearings on university campuses was the biggest story by far. In less than a week, it drew 33 perspectives and 453 media items, reaching over 628k audiences. The story’s size came from the many institutions involved—student groups, representative bodies, and the federal government—each offering their own view on the same testimony.

Pro-Palestinian advocacy groups had the widest reach, making up about a third of all coverage. Spokespeople like Yasmine Johnson from Students for Palestine and Nasser Mashni from the Australia Palestine Advocacy Network told the commission their campus protests are a legitimate justice movement. They also raised concerns that criticism of government policy is being confused with antisemitism, which they say limits open debate.

Jewish student and staff groups also received significant coverage, making up about a fifth of the total. The Australian Union of Jewish Students described campuses where some students feel hesitant to attend and highlighted gaps in how universities handle complaints and support those affected. Most of this coverage came from wire services and was widely shared across news outlets like The Australian or the Midwest Times.

The federal government provided a third perspective, with similar coverage. Education Minister Jason Clare said universities had been slow to act and announced plans to tighten governance standards. This includes clearer anti-racism policies covering both antisemitism and Islamophobia. Reports also noted that TEQSA, the regulator, warned universities about outside groups joining campus protests, and the government’s antisemitism envoy suggested universities could face funding cuts if they do not do enough.

The Labor-Greens Tax Deal

The second-biggest story was more focused but still managed to stir strong reactions. Labor’s deal with the Greens to close a borrowing loophole for self-managed super funds, in return for Greens support on capital gains tax and negative gearing changes, led to 22 perspectives and 232 media items, reaching nearly 177k audiences.

The government, supported by the Greens, presented the deal simply — it closed a loophole that allowed wealthy investors to use their super funds to compete with first-home buyers at auctions. Treasurer Jim Chalmers cited a 2014 recommendation to support the change, and Greens treasury spokesman Nick McKim called it a win against "wealthy property investors."

The Greens, however, took a tougher stance and received similar coverage for saying the deal was only a partial win. They argued that allowing existing arrangements to continue would let Labour protect wealthy investors rather than renters, and said the housing crisis would now be "squarely of Labor's design." This shows that support from a governing partner does not always mean they are satisfied, as Country News highlighted.

Finance and business groups pushed back with nearly as much coverage. The Self-Managed Super Fund Association and the Australian Finance Industry Association said the borrowing rules did not pose a systemic risk and argued that regulators should focus on "aggressive marketing" and property spruiking, not legitimate investors. The Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry warned that the wider capital gains tax changes could hurt business investment. ABC News gave the most detailed account of this perspective, noting the sector was "surprised" by how the deal was made.

Pauline Hanson’s monoculture speech

This story had the fewest perspectives (just seven) but still reached nearly 236k people through 210 media items. That’s a bigger audience than the tax story, which had three times as many viewpoints.

The story began when Pauline Hanson used a National Press Club speech to argue that Australia should replace multiculturalism with a single "monoculture." She cited Paul Hogan and the Socceroos as examples. The backlash was quick and unexpected and Hogan himself called her a "pelican" and said her views were racist. His response ended up shaping the story more than her monoculture speech.

What makes this story notable is what happened afterward. Two polls, Newspoll and Redbridge, showed One Nation’s primary vote dropping by about two points (Dairy News Australia) and Hanson’s personal approval falling ten points into negative territory. Labor regained a narrow lead and Labor minister Murray Watt quickly described the numbers as a "reality check,". This framing spread almost as widely as the original speech, as the Bendigo Advertiser reported.

The speech and the poll results are really one story seen from three sides — Hanson’s message, her critics’ reactions, and Labor’s use of the polling. Each angle received similar coverage, showing that the speech missed its mark and gave the government a useful talking point.

How does this inform PR & Comms Strategy?

First, the number of perspectives in a story is important. A story with many viewpoints, like the antisemitism hearings, needs a different monitoring approach than one with just a few, because the loudest voices might not always be the most important.

Second, pay attention when several perspectives are about the same size, as in the tax deal. If no single viewpoint stands out, the issue is likely still being debated. It’s a good idea to check back after some time instead of treating the first coverage as the final answer.

Third, compare any polarising message to the Hanson example before recommending it to a client. The numbers show that a divisive message can get attention but still turn public opinion against the speaker.

Conclusion

What links these stories is how much is lost when they are reduced to just two sides. The antisemitism hearings, the tax deal, and Hanson’s polling drop were all more complex than their main headlines suggested.

That’s why it’s valuable to track a story by its different perspectives and key drivers. See what Lumina can reveal for your industry or clients, and check out more analysis like this on the Isentia blog. 

​

" ["post_title"]=> string(61) "Who really shaped Australia's latest social cohesion debates?" ["post_excerpt"]=> string(170) "See how Isentia's Lumina tracked 62 perspectives across 3 major Australian stories, revealing how media coverage really spreads and who ends up controlling the narrative." ["post_status"]=> string(7) "publish" ["comment_status"]=> string(4) "open" ["ping_status"]=> string(4) "open" ["post_password"]=> string(0) "" ["post_name"]=> string(59) "who-really-shaped-australias-latest-social-cohesion-debates" ["to_ping"]=> string(0) "" ["pinged"]=> string(0) "" ["post_modified"]=> string(19) "2026-07-23 02:35:20" ["post_modified_gmt"]=> string(19) "2026-07-23 02:35:20" ["post_content_filtered"]=> string(0) "" ["post_parent"]=> int(0) ["guid"]=> string(32) "https://www.isentia.com/?p=48739" ["menu_order"]=> int(0) ["post_type"]=> string(4) "post" ["post_mime_type"]=> string(0) "" ["comment_count"]=> string(1) "0" ["filter"]=> string(3) "raw" }
Blog
Who really shaped Australia’s latest social cohesion debates?

See how Isentia’s Lumina tracked 62 perspectives across 3 major Australian stories, revealing how media coverage really spreads and who ends up controlling the narrative.

object(WP_Post)#9081 (24) { ["ID"]=> int(47963) ["post_author"]=> string(2) "75" ["post_date"]=> string(19) "2026-06-03 02:01:58" ["post_date_gmt"]=> string(19) "2026-06-03 02:01:58" ["post_content"]=> string(5651) "

There is a new frontier where public perception is shaped: Large Language Models. Right now, LLMs are answering critical questions about your organisation. What are they saying? And more importantly, which sources are shaping those answers?

To navigate this landscape, public relations professionals don't need generic tools, but rather technology that speaks their language, and addresses the realities of a changed media and informational landscape.

That is why we're unveiling Lumina AI View, the latest addition to our intelligent suite of AI tools from Isentia. Trained specifically on the workflows and challenges of modern PR & communications, Lumina AI View helps you understand exactly what AI knows about you, and how it learned it.

A new standard for AI visibility

AI View tracks your citation strength and source quality alongside those of your competitors, giving you a clear view of where you hold authority and where you have gaps.

Lumina AI View maps your AI reputation from the ground up, allowing you to:

  • See which sources matter: When tools such as ChatGPT or Gemini discuss your organisation, which outlets do they cite? Track your source footprint over time and view the impact of key target media on how you’re discussed. We measure your citation strength and source quality alongside those of competitors, giving you a clear view of where you have authority and where you have gaps.
  • Gain industry-specific insight: Your competitors get cited from Financial Times and Bloomberg. You get cited on Reddit. Each brings opportunity – and risk. Discover how you measure up against industry standards, and target the sources that actually influence how AI represents you.
  • Catch narrative shifts early: AI responses change when new sources appear, sentiment shifts, or old controversies resurface. Get alerts when citation patterns change suddenly, before they impact the way you’re perceived by stakeholders.

Measure your progress: From media monitoring to full media intelligence

Lumina AI View is built on the principle that insights get stronger with repeated measurement. To help you maintain a clear view of your reputation, our proprietary scoring system provides regular updates that show you:

  • Evolving trends in how sources cite your organisation
  • Competitive standing and benchmark metrics
  • Where models differ in information presented, and sources cited 

Whether you run it weekly, on-demand, or whenever you need a check-in, patterns will emerge, trends will become clear, and you will build a baseline that makes any sudden narrative changes both comprehensible and the prerequisite to action.

Lumina AI View is part of Lumina AI, a comprehensive suite of AI tools built specifically for communicators. Our Lumina suite evolves traditional media monitoring into narrative intelligence, enabling you to truly understand how perceptions form, evolve, and impact your reputation.

Get in touch to register your interest and see what Lumina AI View can do for you.

" ["post_title"]=> string(66) "Introducing Lumina AI View: AI Visibility Built for PR & Comms" ["post_excerpt"]=> string(158) "Lumina AI View, the latest in Isentia's AI suite, is trained on PR & comms workflows to help you understand what AI knows about you — and how it learned it." ["post_status"]=> string(7) "publish" ["comment_status"]=> string(4) "open" ["ping_status"]=> string(4) "open" ["post_password"]=> string(0) "" ["post_name"]=> string(59) "introducing-lumina-ai-view-ai-visibility-built-for-pr-comms" ["to_ping"]=> string(0) "" ["pinged"]=> string(0) "" ["post_modified"]=> string(19) "2026-07-15 03:12:57" ["post_modified_gmt"]=> string(19) "2026-07-15 03:12:57" ["post_content_filtered"]=> string(0) "" ["post_parent"]=> int(0) ["guid"]=> string(32) "https://www.isentia.com/?p=47963" ["menu_order"]=> int(0) ["post_type"]=> string(4) "post" ["post_mime_type"]=> string(0) "" ["comment_count"]=> string(1) "0" ["filter"]=> string(3) "raw" }
Blog
Introducing Lumina AI View: AI Visibility Built for PR & Comms

Lumina AI View, the latest in Isentia’s AI suite, is trained on PR & comms workflows to help you understand what AI knows about you — and how it learned it.

Ready to get started?

Get in touch or request a demo.

Contact us Request a demo