Good news travels fast; bad news goes viral. If you’re in the business of media, marketing and branding, it’s likely you’re keen to understand how a story unfolds; which platforms ignite and which ones placate an issue.
The question of what makes a story spread piqued the interest of storytellers long before the marketing and communications industry existed. It dates back as far as 350 A.D where Aristotle disclosed that so long as his writings adhered to the three basic principles of ethos, pathos, and logos – that is, if his words were credible, evoked emotion and appealed to reason – then they would spread freely from person to person.
Fast forward a few centuries and today we have an array of data that helps us to fully understand the patterns that underpin successful stories. Using complex algorithms coupled with machine learning, Isentia’s Stories engine is able to track the volume and reach of stories as they develop; drilling down to individual media items where necessary, across traditional, digital and social media channels.
In effect, one look at Stories, on any device, will let you identify the key issues of the day and the key influencers and outlets driving them. Often, the accelerator will surprise you.
Traditional versus social media
As marketers and communicators, we are often asked which platform is most effective in spreading a message – traditional or social media? This is mostly because brands want to know where to best invest their valuable marketing/ communication dollars. The short answer is, neither one nor the other is more effective. In fact, the interplay between the two is what generally prompts a story to ‘go viral’.
Take for example the media storm that engulfed South Australia’s energy woes in early 2017. The abridged version is that the sudden (and unexpected) shut down of ageing coal plants, in Victoria and South Australia, placed enormous pressure on power supply. The situation was covered sparingly in mainstream media, and less so on social: energy policy is not a topic that usually excites Twittersphere.
The issue prompted Tesla’s head of energy products, Lyndon Rive, to appear on ABC radio and suggest that Tesla could solve South Australia’s looming energy crisis within 100 days with high-capacity batteries. Over the next 24 hours Rive completed a number of media interviews on the topic, but the proposal didn’t take flight. That is, until a Twitter exchange fueled the conversation.
The Elon Musk Tweet that Flicked the Switch
When Australian tech mogul, Mike Cannon-Brooks, and Tesla founder Elon Musk began trading tweets a day later, suddenly the story went viral. The tweets were candid, novel and authentic, helped along by Musk’s 13 million plus followers. It should be noted that it is incredibly rare for social media to lead traditional, so what happened next could never have been predicted.
Tweets making news
Traditional media began reporting on the tweets which not only amplified but also legitimised the story. Four days later when Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull entered the conversation, traditional media coverage reached its highest peak.
The interplay between news reports and Twitter played out for over a week gathering more than 1120 news mentions across press, online, broadcast and social media, with the tweets referenced in almost half of the press and internet articles. The sentiment was remarkably positive, with 56% of coverage favouring the use of batteries to save power problems. Elon Musk was praised and renewable energy was widely supported.
In this instance, Aristotle would concur that all bases were covered; Rive’s battery storage proposal was supported by credible sources, it evoked emotion among frustrated bill payers and appealed to reason by offering a sustainable and cost-effective solution for the energy crisis. But no one could have ever imagined that such an open Twitter exchange would ignite an online news explosion that would prompt even the Prime Minister to weigh in. The secret? The tweet offered a rare insight into the world of business that the general public don’t often see. Appealing to our inner voyeur, the tweets between Musk and Cannon-Brooks gave us unprecedented access to boardroom conversations that are ordinarily mediated by press statements and publicists.
It’s highly unusual that one platform or person will make a story go truly viral. It’s when traditional and social media converge that the magic happens. Social media provides a platform for the public to weigh into debate, adding fuel to the already developing fire.
The take home message
Audiences are changing, society is changing, technology is changing and the business landscape is changing. The important lesson is to not be caught off-guard. We must be leveraging technology to keep pace with the news at speeds beyond human capacity. This will enable us to create strategies to maximise opportunities or minimise risk when a story goes viral.
Sean Smith leads the Media Intelligence at Isentia and is responsible for overseeing the delivery of this specialised service to 5,000 clients across APAC. With 15 years’ experience in the media intelligence industry, Sean has contributed to the growth and success of Isentia’s core business across ANZ, paving the way for Isentia’s successful expansion into Asia. He has extensive client knowledge across corporate, government and public relations sectors, now leading the charge on product development, client success and the implementation of new and emerging technologies.
Originally featured in Business First Magazine.